Having worked with 4th/5th graders for over a month now, we have observed certain common interests and disinterests of 10 and 11 year olds.They are generally a group of students, who enjoy outdoor activities like running, playing basketball.Thus, we wanted to plan a lesson, which will not only spark their interest, but also cultivate acquisition of basic knowledge in creating spreadsheets and graphs as well as ability to conduct scientific investigations. Seeing that 4th and 5th graders are at Piaget's concrete operational and formal operational stages, lessons and activities that encourage hypothesis testing and abstract thought are appropriate and fitting for them. Students are generally more interested in participating in activities and lessons that require them to use their analytic thinking skills, and not mere memorization of factoids. Conversely, they seem disinterested in lessons where they are situated in one location for hours doing one monotonous activity such as listening to the teacher lecture, reading a book, doing tomorrow's homework in advance, and other more prosaic activities. Considering our target grade and subject, we have designed a lesson plan that will creatively foster them to learn SOL objectives for this selected grade level.
Students will perform different exercises and given a stop watch and data form, record pulse rates, predict which exercises will cause a faster heart rate, and be able to make a chart and graph the results. The students will complete an essay using the data to support or refute their predictions, and show their general understanding of using data to prove a hypothesis.
The SOL Objective with this lesson:
Scientific Investigation, Reasoning, and Logic
4.1 The student will plan and conduct investigations in which
The students are also to complete a short essay (2 paragraphs) saying what their original prediction was, what their data showed, and why or why not they were right or wrong.The printed spreadsheet with bar graphs should be attached to verify that the students are reading the graphs correctly.An "A" paper would state clearly the students initial prediction, accurately describe what their data had shown, give a conclusion detailing whether or not their prediction was right, and give reasons drawing from material learned about heart rates as to why one exercise had more of an impact on their heart rate than another.
Students essays should be graded on the following sections:
30 points
Initial Prediction: Should focus on their initial prediction and
the reasons they made such a prediction. This should draw information
from the lesson on heart rates done earlier. "B-F" papers
will lack one of these criteria (like prediction without justification,
nothing is drawn from the lesson).
30 points
Use of Data: Should focus on if the student shows competency in
knowing what the data means and how to use it to support the outcomes.
Is the data organized and complete? "B-F" essays will
lack this.
40 points
Conclusion: Should focus on tying it all together. Did they use
the data accurately to gauge whether or not their predictions
were correct? Did they give reasons on why their predictions were
incorrect (if they were) based on the lesson of heart rate given
earlier? If they lack one of these, then the paper should be marked
down.